Uncertainty-Aware Finger Force Estimation for Reliable Box Manipulation
With force adaptation
FEELWithout force adaptation
Baseline10 trials per condition, using the same box specification and predefined motion. Reliability = task success and a damage-free outcome.
Primary status for all experiment grids below.
Reliable indicates task success and a damage-free outcome. Each card reports both criteria separately.
With force estimation experiments
(Kp, Kd) = (200, 400)Force-adaptive manipulation driven by FEEL estimates.
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
Without force estimation experiments
(Kp, Kd) = (200, 400)Fixed finger commands without force-estimation feedback.
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- No
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- No
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- No
Gain comparison experiments
Ten force-adaptive box-manipulation trials for each controller-gain setting.
(Kp, Kd) = (100, 200)
RMSE: 0.233 ± 0.005 N
- Task success
- No
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- No
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- No
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- No
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- No
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- No
- Damage-free
- Yes
(Kp, Kd) = (200, 400)
Used in the main experimentsRMSE: 0.251 ± 0.010 N
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
(Kp, Kd) = (300, 600)
RMSE: 0.255 ± 0.008 N
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- No
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- No
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- No
- Task success
- Yes
- Damage-free
- Yes
Data collection
Wearable F/T reference measurements synchronized with per-finger proprioceptive histories.
Approximately 25,000 synchronized estimator samples and an additional 5,000 calibration samples were collected per finger. Robot states and F/T measurements were aligned by timestamp.
Uncertainty-aware force estimation
Per-finger force estimates and predictive uncertainty under proprioceptive ambiguity.
Force through joints
Force through structure
Epistemic uncertainty is used as an empirical proxy for ambiguity in the proprioceptive force estimate.